China Introduces Dual-Track Drug Pricing Model: NRDL and the First-Ever Commercial Health Insurance Innovative Drug List (CHIIDL) Reform Healthcare Access
24 November 2025
China has taken a major step in its ongoing healthcare reform by concluding its negotiations for the 2025 National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) and, for the first time, unveiling the Commercial Health Insurance Innovative Drug List (CHIIDL). This development represents the eighth adjustment of the NRDL since the National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) was established, but it marks the first instance wherein an independent commercial insurance drug list is positioned alongside the state’s reimbursement system. The implications extend far beyond basic healthcare access in China, signaling a paradigm shift in how pharmaceutical access, innovation, and market structure will operate in the world’s second-largest drug market.
According to authoritative sources, the final drug lists for both NRDL and CHIIDL are pending publication, expected in December 2025, and will come into effect on January 1, 2026. However, early indications suggest that even previously excluded high-cost therapies, such as million-yuan-per-dose CAR-T cell therapies, have seen remarkable advances in the negotiations, potentially making them the first entrants to benefit from this dual-track mechanism. The CHIIDL focuses exclusively on highly innovative drugs endowed with significant clinical value that often fell outside the strict price caps of the national scheme. Its introduction aims to create a multi-tier model in which essential medicines are covered by government insurance and next-generation therapies can be more swiftly adopted via commercial channels.
For multinational pharmaceutical manufacturers and investors seeking to commercialize innovative products in China, the CHIIDL presents an unprecedented market entrance. Previously, highly innovative, high-cost treatments, such as biologics and cell therapies, were typically excluded from NRDL negotiations since entry price caps hovered around RMB 500,000, with successful inclusion often requiring prices below RMB 300,000 per course. The CHIIDL radically departs from this model, facilitating flexible, market-oriented negotiations and allowing manufacturers to apply for NRDL and CHIIDL inclusion in parallel or separately. In 2025, 24 new innovative drugs joined the first round of CHIIDL negotiations versus 127 candidates for the NRDL. The NHSA will coordinate review, expert evaluation, and price negotiation across both reimbursement tracks, expanding commercial access and accelerating institutional adoption.
Implementation, however, comes with operational hurdles. A critical enabler is hospital inclusion and integrated reimbursement infrastructure, which are necessary for commercial health insurance policies covering CHIIDL-listed drugs to work at the point of care. Recent reforms grant 'three exemptions' for CHIIDL drugs—including exemptions from centralized procurement caps and DRG-based payment mechanisms—helping reduce operational barriers. Some Chinese cities, such as Shanghai, Shandong, Hangzhou, and Xiamen, have pioneered 'one-stop reimbursement' systems allowing instant, seamless identification and coverage of insured patients—an essential model for scaling up across China's hospital system. By August 2025, Shandong province alone processed 36 million claim cases and RMB 2.1 billion in insurer payouts for 5.6 million insured patients via this system. Central government authorities plan to roll out a nationwide clearinghouse and data-sharing infrastructure to support cross-province settlement and 'Medicare + Commercial Insurance' payments.
The dual-track reimbursement system delivers significant ramifications for global drug developers, wholesalers, and supply chain leaders. For the first time, it is possible to pursue synchronized reimbursement from both public and commercial payers, accelerating time-to-market for innovative medicines and expanding the scope of drugs that may achieve reimbursement. Pharma companies can engage with Chinese authorities more flexibly and may find it economically viable to bring premium-priced therapies to market—an especially attractive opportunity for biologics, rare disease treatments, and cell and gene therapies. Meanwhile, commercial health product providers must refine actuarial models and risk pooling products, such as group and supplemental policies, to absorb the cost burden without risking sustainability. Experiences from the U.S., where group insurance covers 85% of private medical policies, offer lessons for scaling commercial insurance adoption.
China’s dual-track approach marks a watershed for pharmaceutical access and payment innovation, and could serve as a blueprint for other emerging markets grappling with the balance between innovation incentives and patient affordability. For global and local pharmaceutical businesses—especially those in manufacturing, logistics, regulatory, and commercial functions—this move signals a new era of access strategy, competitive intensity, and regulatory complexity in China’s evolving healthcare market. Industry observers anticipate that foreign companies, contract researchers, CRO/CMOs, payers, and hospital networks will all need to recalibrate their plans and partnerships to navigate the new dual-track framework. As full implementation arrives in early 2026, China may reshape the global landscape of pharmaceutical reimbursement and patient access to innovative therapies.